The process of finishing a movement refers to the work done on all the components of a movement to improve their surface and contours, but also to make it more beautiful than crude. This need appeared as watch makers started to miniaturize the watches, hence reducing the space between two components. Movement’s finishing also had another practical function: it helped avoiding undesired friction and debris from components traveling in the movement, and it   caught some dust (the purpose of circular-graining and/or Côtes de Genève).

Finishing a movement also includes plating and engraving: the first one is done to prevent oxidation while the second is purely decorative. We, at TWE, do not especially appreciate engraving, since a perfectly finished movement does not need the help of engraving to enhance its beauty. On the contrary, nowadays we see too many brands engrave movements to hide scratches or imperfect finishes.

Some issues about finishes have nothing to do with functionality but everything with art and beauty: beveling (anglage), inward and outward angling, rounding (berçage), blueing parts and circular-graining (perlage). This is about style, but also about know-how.

In most manufactures, this process is done by dedicated craftsmen, while the watch makers only take care of the assembling and regulation of the movement. At some independent watch makers (Philippe Dufour, Romain Gauthier, Kari Voutilainen, Haldimann, De Bethune…), the watch maker is also in charge of the finishes.

As an average, a simple movement contains around 200 – 250 components. One can easily imagine the amount of time needed to finish each of them in a complicated movement, with sometimes over 600 components. When you know that to finish a tourbillon’s bridge (by hand of course) with a bercé and inward angles, the craftsman can spend between 6 and  8 hours, you realize that all of a sudden this step is of paramount importance in the production cost of a movement. In fact, for the real haute horlogerie brands, the cost of finishing a movement accounts for 35 – 50 % of the total cost of the watch.

This represents only the actual cost, meaning the numbers of hours spent multiplied by the number of persons involved multiplied by the hourly cost of a watch maker. If we were to be perfectly complete, we should add to this cost the training cost (years and years) of the craftsmen and the cost of the lost components (i.e. the components that have been finished but have failed to pass the quality check, plus the time spent in vain by the craftsmen).

Why is it so difficult?

- the size of the components: as an example, a tourbillon normally has around 70 components for a total weight of 0.3 gram!!! Yes, one third of a gram. And if you work at De Bethune, you will suffer even more because their tourbillon weights only 0.18 gram (world record); the good news is it has only 54 parts, so you have less components to finish… In a more normal movement, the total weight of the most widely used movement in the industry (ETA 2892) is around 20 grams for a total of around 200 components: that gives an average of 0.10 gram per component!

- the material of the components: normally brass or steel, sometimes titanium or carbon fiber. These materials have one thing in common: the impossibility to re-use the component if there is a mistake or an error when finishing it. Unlike gold or platinum, brass and steel re-use process is impossible for a manufacturer. A lost component is lost completely;

- there is no allowance for mistake: take the 2120 movement from Audemars Piguet, the slimmest automatic movement with central rotor (a mere 2.95 mm thick), or the 1208P from Piaget, the slimmest automatic movement with micro-rotor (2.35 mm!!). There is simply no space at all between two components, there is no allowance for any imperfection. Surface condition has to be impeccable, because any flaw would result in dramatically increased friction. If you think that a hair can block a movement, you can conceive that only perfection is acceptable;

- the length of the craftsman’s training: this issue is producing a bottle neck in terms of availability of highly skilled workforce for so many houses. And training time is not compressible. Only the repetition of the same over a long period of time can result in acquired knowhow and art;

- the eyes of the craftsman are his most severe judge: the person in charge of finishing a movement, in the haute horlogerie world, knows perfectly what he is meant to do; he knows that his ideal he should coincide with his real he, otherwise he will not be proud of his work. If he is not happy with his work, he will prefer to do it again instead of closing his eyes. And also because he knows that other watch makers (the one in charge of assembling the movement, or the one in charge of servicing the watch) will see his work one of these days.

Strangely, the most valuable part of the watch is the less known one and the less appreciated either by the end customers or by the commercial staff inside the manufacture. Which brand communicates on its ability to produce state-of-the-art finishes? No one. Why? Because it is not that easy to understand and very few commercial and/or communication & marketing people know what the finishes of a movement consist in. Also because many brands DO NOT WANT to communicate on that issue, as they know that their actual production is not up to their reputation. Especially among the haute horlogerie  brands.

This is a true shame for all these brands that are the depositary of a tradition that is at risk now. Problem: it costs a lot and nobody appreciates it. But the risk is that machine imitation of hand finishes will become more and more common. The consequences would go far beyond the simple fact that the human would be replaced by a machine and it would be a pity for the romantic lovers of the past. No, it would be the complete loss of a portion of the human knowledge (a small one though) in favor of reduced costs and increased margins, in one word in favor of money. Of course it is useless if we consider that the human being only needs to do useful things. For those who consider that art, excellence, effort and achievement are an objective in itself and are useful in an other way, it would be a dramatic loss as nowhere else is this art used nowadays.

Now, what are the criteria to judge the finishes of a movement? How can I know that this movement has been finished by hand and not by a machine?

Well, first of all, let’s say that watch makers have ALWAYS used machines, even in the 17th century. Of course, nothing to do with the modern CNC or electro-erosion machines that one normally sees in a manufacture. To be convinced, there are two brands that dedicate a huge part of their museum to these machines: JeanRichard in La-Chaux-de-Fonds and DeWitt in Geneva.

So watchmakers have always used machines when the result of that use was better than with the hand. It is still the case today in some traditional brands.  A good result does NOT mean that the result is always the same: the nice thing about hand finishing is that each watch will be slightly different from the others. Oddly, some computer programs do introduce some irregularities in their work to copy the result of a hand finished circular-graining…

How can I spot a hand finished movement from a machine finished movement?

Few answers:

1. Inward angles: this is the definite issue. An inward angle cannot be done by a machine without leaving a burr on the bevel, and we at TWE do not know of any machine being able to do an inward angle. Why? Because an angle will be milled with a cutter that has a rounded head, hence the angle will always be rounded. Only the hand of the watch maker can make a perfect inward angle. Same is true with outward angles, but there are now some machines that can cut the bridge neatly; in any case the polish on the bevel will have to be done by hand.

2. Black polish: black polish is also called mirror polish. This form of polishing consists in achieving a perfectly flat surface that shall reflect the light only in one direction. Depending on the sight angle, the aspect of the component will be either black, grey or white. This finish can be obtained only by hand. Such finish can be found on screws, hammers of a minute-repeater (or sonnerie), on the bridge of a tourbillon or on certain bridges or end pieces (eg. on several DeBethune timepieces).

3. Côtes de Genève without waves on the bevel: Côtes de Genève were used in the past for two reasons. First to catch dust, as an irregular state of surface would act as a Velcro with dust; second to indicate to the watchmaker the surface that has been finished. In most cases, the Côtes de Genève are done by a machine that removes a little bit of material, hence when the Côtes de Genève end on a bevel it creates a small wave. In a hand finished Côtes de Genève the watch maker will not remove any material, he will act so smoothly that there will be no waves on the bevel.

4. Bevelled screw-head slot: yes it exists. Only to be spotted with a good loupe or microscope.

5. Rounded-off: this type of finish is usely done on the bevels, bridges or the fork of an escapement. Rounding-off can only be done by hand.

These examples can easily illustrate the huge amount of time required to finish a movement by hand. The round-off of a tourbillon’s bridge can take as long as 6 to 8 hours and a nice inward angle with a perfectly polished bevel also. So imagine how much time has to spend a watch maker to finish an average movement consisting in 250 components!

Time has no respect for what is done without it; nothing will replace a perfectly executed hand finish, which is an art. Machines are more and more precise, but the hand of a master watch maker will never be replaced.

So, next time you look at an open case-back watch, try to spot these details to determine whether the movement has been finished by hand. By doing that, you will just help this unknown art to perdure, and any comment will definitely please the watchmaker if he hears you.

PdP